Surfing all the Health And Safety Executive stats, deaths linked with work at heights declined during the 2008/9 12 months by 33% over the average of the past 3 years so I suspect as safety experts we can all offer ourselves a pat on the back? Since the formation of the actual Working at Height Regulations 2005 this presents a marked enhancement does it not?
Although, as for many statistics these types could be easily read using a sure cynicism, but a lowering from 55 during 2007/8 to 35 the following year was a great development. However, more pessimistic will be the Major Accident data, the increase of 42% to 4654 and so the 3+ day injury rate, a 78% step-up to 7065.
Upgrades & the adoption of all safety apparatus including fall arrests, fall prevention and safe landing have in all probability begun to have a bearing on the actual quantity of fatalities, except they too possess the possibility to create challenges of their own such as suspension trauma amd strains and sprains.
Method Statements and Risk Assessments that I have seen have built in fall prevention and fall mitigation, yet do I see 1 that involves a rescue plan should something take place at height or depth, a rescue plan must the fall arrest equipment be utilised or how the organisation is intending to evaluate their working practices versus their particular program.
Examining more into the Health And Safety Executive provided information is even more disturbing. The actual company analysis 2007 indicates than 16% use safety equipment to manage the hazards, no more than 31% apply risk assessment to control the hazards and 38% of companies assume they can do no more to control the risks. Try convincing that to the 12289 individuals harmed in 2008/9?
Contrast this with the actual employees study in which less than half of people working at height have acquired education in the dangers, and practically Sixty Percent of those interviewed talk about their supervisors hadn’t confirmed the working practices with respect to them working at height in the preceding year.
It might be fascinating to observe if the the vast majority of the accidents took place inside of these kinds of companies yet I’m sorry to report you can not that from the data given. It obviously begs the questions though of how the method statements as well as risk assessments have been unique to the work being undertaken when the supervisors had not already been to see the task or carried out an audit or even review of the working methods against these.
We should be thankful that there have been fewer deaths however we should be increasingly attentive to the possibilities for work at height incidents happening in the first place. Stricter working at height legislation has helped, I am confident, though practical application of safe working practice to effectively trained and motivated individuals with more interaction with employers and supervisors should improve things farther.
Whenever we have helped lower fall from height deaths, far better still gotten rid of them and made great improvements to the serious injuries caused from these accidents, we may modestly salute ourselves.
For more information on working at height check out the site on Health And Safety
May 21 2010 03:37 pm | Uncategorized